Google notwithstanding, Verbose and Myself are the only people online right now.


Does this mean we are going steady?






I don't need to justify this thread, I'm your better!

No, I'm afraid not. Today I decided that Inappropriately Loud Girl and myself are dating now. I'm in a monogomous mood, so we'll just have to settle for illicit homoerotica.

Inapporpriately Loud Girl? Another Drawn Together character?

I'm all up for your illicit homoerotica... YouTube won't let me watch Queer as Folk.

No, Inappropriately Loud Girl is a young lady of my personal acquaintance. I know you might not believe this, but she's loud and inappropriate.

You're in for a treat though, Raebullah. I'm a lot more pretentious than Queer as Folk and my erotica is explicit!

Your Erotica?

Can it be purchased? is there a newsletter? Will my local retailers stock it?

I've never actually bothered to put the majority of my thoughts to paper, but there are a few bits and pieces lying about I could direct you to that were mine. Of course, I was only responding to a challenge wherein I would write a few hundred smutty words on a prompt daily. It lasted for a week before the friendship liquidated.

Watching MST3K with friends online is my erotica.

Pictures/videos or you can't talk about it =P

And since neither of those are allowed on this site, you're just SOL

...superbly....orgasmtastic....lover?

Well, that only precludes pictures and video. Traditionally speaking, erotica was written word. It's only in the last, oh, hundred years that the other mediums have gained in popularity [to the point of eliminating mainstream oldschool erotica].

I mean, Sappho worked in poems. The Marquis de Sade wrote philosophical pr0n. Western history is riddled with written erotica.

So maybe I'll just write up all my perversions. See where we end up.


Oh, so that's what that means.

*grins* I know. I was being a smart ass. I write erotica nowdays *Shrugs* and its better than the crap you'll find in Hustler and Playboy. I know. I've read that.

I bet he'd buy, like, a thousand sex cages.



Everyone with a deskjob and a computer writes erotica.

And gambles online.

Seriously, secretaries get paid to have sinful sinful lives.

Please. As though magazines will offer anything valuable. They're only [at best] amusing parodies of proper writing, shallow fantasies lacking any depth or intricacy or genuine eroticism.

The true mark of eroticism is being able to turn someone on with it when they find the sexuality entailed distasteful.

But here's the kicker... How can you tell the true mark of eroticism if the reader finds no sexuality distasteful?

The true mark is lots of rural metaphors and a handsome country boy.

Use words like "Barn doors" and "Stallion" and you'll fit right in. Bull and "Horn" can work well too.


You want a casual reader to at first assume they're actually rutting in haystack, and only on a full reading discover that they were in a hotel and there was no actual sex.


On another note - If I find all sexuality highly arousing, do I therefore deprive writers of skill?


Edit: Looks like Jorry beat me to the Q.

Jorry.... Please die. In a fire. Thank you for your compliance.

Distasteful is a word between hate and disinterest. It's why I picked it.

Example; generally speaking, vanilla sexual encounters (homo-, hetero- or bisexual in nature) leave me dry. I consider something erotic if, when offering vanilla sexual encounters, gets me a little moist. If you know what I mean, say no more, say no more.


You're what we in the biz call a trisexual.

Your biz is highly exclusive if you can only think of three options.

No, it just means you'll try anything sexual. Ha ha that joke is hilarious.

That joke only works in speech, not text.

According to Wikipedia - which I generally won't trust on anything, but I'm willing to accept the wisdom of international perverts on the sex topics, there's the noted difference of "trisexual" and "trysexual"


I'm from Sydney, I don't need to be any kind of Prefix-sexual. I'm from Sydney damnit!

People tell me that the line, "They're more interested in Profits than Prophets" only works in text.

If I don't listen to them, I won't listen to you.

Atheism is a non-prophet organisation.