All I've played was WoW, and I'm still playing it.
QUOTE(Scaramouche @ Oct 29 2008, 10:55 PM) [snapback]314634[/snapback]
Community.
I would expect the communities to be about the same. I'm sure both are very large, probably equally as active. But I welcome any discussion of this.
Depends on where you go. If you go to a PvP forum, expect a lot of bragging, name-calling, and other basic aggression.
In general, if you do go to a forum asking for help, you'll get a helpful post or two, and five or six telling you to just play the game.
QUOTE(Scaramouche @ Oct 29 2008, 10:55 PM) [snapback]314634[/snapback]
Graphics.
I wasn't impressed with the WOW graphics, last time I had a look. EQ2 did look better.
I will say this, NEVER choose a game based on graphics. One of the most fun games I've played was Master of Magic for DOS, and it's still fun to play. I has NO storyline and has, well, DOS graphics!
QUOTE(Scaramouche @ Oct 29 2008, 10:55 PM) [snapback]314634[/snapback]
Character types.
I like a lot of variety and the ability to customise. It seems EQ2 is ahead on this point, but I'm not sure.
Define customize. More abilities for each class? Pretty outfits? General look of the character? I know they've added a barber shop in WoW for hair changes. Now all I see is humans walking around with "super sayan hair".
QUOTE(Scaramouche @ Oct 29 2008, 10:55 PM) [snapback]314634[/snapback]
Gameplay/Rules.
Which has the better gameplay? The better rules? Best moderation?
I enjoy the gameplay of WoW. If you look at the screen of a level 70, it all seems daunting with all the buttons and abilities and addons etc. It all builds up over time, it starts out slow, then grows into a mammoth game.
QUOTE(Scaramouche @ Oct 29 2008, 10:55 PM) [snapback]314634[/snapback]
Inexplicable crap.
Now one thing I find utterly stupid in many games these days is the whacky idea that a rogue/thief/etc is a better warrior than a trained warrior. Like some little lightweight with a leather shirt and a dagger will have better attack and defence than a serious warrior in plate armour with a huge freakin sword. I'm told this unfortunate bit of bizzaro crap is the case in WOW, that lightweight thiefy dudes with tiny little daggers are better warriors than the actual warriors. Is this true?
Its not THAT the rogue has daggers, its WHERE the rogue puts the daggers.
Think of it this way, the rogue is the first guy who will stab you in the crotch if it means he lives.
I think that every class is beatable, just not by every other class. Approach it like rock, paper, scissors.
Sure, a Rogue may eat a Warrior, but a Hunter almost always eats a Rogue. I think Warriors may have the easiest time against Warlocks and Priests.
QUOTE(Scaramouche @ Oct 29 2008, 10:55 PM) [snapback]314634[/snapback]
Price.
I'll be making a ton of money as soon as I begin my new job, but it's always good to check out prices.
15 bucks a month for WoW.
QUOTE(Scaramouche @ Oct 29 2008, 10:55 PM) [snapback]314634[/snapback]
Other games.
Are there any other online games these days which can match those two in terms of size and quality?
no clue, WoW is coming out with another expansion soon raising the level cap to 80 and giving the players a total of 4 continents to explore.
Kalimdor, Eastern Kingdoms, Outland, and then Northrend.
Then there is the 10 races, each with an ability (some passive, others activated) which are only usable by their respective class.
Alliance: Humans, Dwarves, Gnomes, Night Elves, and Draenei
Horde: Orcs, Trolls, Tauren, Undead, and Blood Elves
Then there are the 9 classes (soon to be 10) which when combined with the classes make a rock, paper, scissors effect.
Druid, Hunter, Mage, Shaman, Priest, Warlock, Warrior, Mage, Paladin, and once WotLK comes out, the Dark Knight.