QUOTE(Tobrian @ Sep 7 2008, 09:44 PM) [snapback]289178[/snapback]
Let's see if I understand this correctly...
The city is ruled by "the king's regent". Which apparently isn't Aelloon, otherwise I think Benny would have mentioned him by name. But Aelloon seems to be the commander of the Legion's forces and... the leader of the secret police force?
The Legion keeps out of the Outer City quarters, leaving them to govern themselves, which is done by the Guilds (is that Thieves Guild legal and official?)... How does that work, if all food and supplies for the nobles and elite citizens have to be produced in the Quarters or pass into the city through the Quarters? Sounds like you could just starve the nobles. Unless the Legion is used to keeping everyone in line through brute force, but terror regimes without support from The People seldom last longer than a couple years.
So the guilds run things, but bow to the king... why? He keeps the balance of power stable, the streets clean and crime organized? (The Vetinari method.) Nobody wants civil war, so they all grudgingly go along with it? The king doesn't share power, but delegates things... read, he bribes people with official titles, giving them a piece of the cake. But how does the King stay in power? Military force alone? Divine Right that everyone believes in? Mind control? Well, monarchies have worked for millenia, so maybe I'm overthinking things here.
Is this a hereditary monarchy, or a feudalism where the king is elected by the nobility or at least crowned with their consent? (Which was surprisingly common way to run things.) Somehow I get the feeling that the king isn't married (the bit about sharing not power).
Remember, this is a summary described by a layperson (who also happens to be an outlaw). This description doesn't necessarily have to make sense, except to her. It could be that there are official administrators of the guilds, but they pretty much ignored by everyone, so Benny's analyzation is accurate, but not "official policy."
The legions apparently don't stay out of the "quarters" out of fear, since they are totally capable of entering for executions. In that case, let us assume that the situation is something like this:
The king rules through the might and power of his legions, or seems to, seeing how feared those legions are. Some wealthy but crooked individuals in the quarters would prefer not to have a bunch of soldiers breathing down their necks, so they pay tribute to the king to stay out of their affairs. The king likes this source of income, so the soldiers don't hang around in the individuals' territory, but they do occasionally bare their teeth at all and sundry in hopes of keeping some semblance of order. Just because the legions weren't
stationed in Rome doesn't mean that they weren't able to
get to Rome double-quick to shut down any rioting.
If this is the case, than supplies, etc. wouldn't be a problem to get into the city, since the guild admins wouldn't want people aggravating the the king either. Additionally, it isn't stated whether or not the quarters extend entirely around the city. It may be that there is a four-mile wide stretch of wilderness on one side, allowing direct access to the more "noble" areas of the city.
Other than this, the situation appears to be fairly "normal" for a fantasy world.
On a side note, sharing power and delegating are two very different things. One could easily argue that a general doesn't "share" power, but he'd have to be an idiot if he thought he could tell every single private his orders specifically. Even Pharaoh, though considered a god, handed over the administrative aspect to Joseph. Rome's Emperor ran the Empire through local governors.
@ Czernobog: I think that what Tobrian was saying is that most "Terror Regimes" don't last longer than a couple of generations. "A couple of years" was simple hyperbole, unless Tobrian has never heard of
Mobutu,
Edward Longshanks or the USSR. It
is true that if one rules by terror, as soon as a ruler comes that isn't good at using that terror, the regime falls. Generally, one must be a good deal smarter to rule by fear than to rule by love.